The plays are beyond bad. Not even close. How can you be this bad and have people pay this much?
43-41 and -1.65 units is "beyond bad"? And to answer your question, here is why:
2014-2015: 189-176, -2.85 UNITS
2013-2014: 105-87, +9.55 UNITS
2012-2013: 101-55, +43.00 UNITS
2011-2012: 173-133, +30.05 UNITS
2010-2011: 232-220, -8.60 UNITS
2009-2010: 265-188, +61.10 UNITS
2008-2009: 272-215, +40.85 UNITS
2007-2008: 159-122, +18.45 UNITS
2006-2007: 78-46, +19.45 UNITS
2005-2006: 76-64, +7.45 UNITS
2004-2005: 86-76, +1.15 UNITS
2003-2004: 77-68*, +3.10 UNITS
2002-2003: 45-33, +11.50 UNITS
2001-2002: 60-50, +11.60 UNITS
2000-2001: 59-50, +1.80 UNITS
1999-2000: 68-62, +5.50 UNITS
43-41 and -1.65 units is "beyond bad"? And to answer your question, here is why:
2014-2015: 189-176, -2.85 UNITS
2013-2014: 105-87, +9.55 UNITS
2012-2013: 101-55, +43.00 UNITS
2011-2012: 173-133, +30.05 UNITS
2010-2011: 232-220, -8.60 UNITS
2009-2010: 265-188, +61.10 UNITS
2008-2009: 272-215, +40.85 UNITS
2007-2008: 159-122, +18.45 UNITS
2006-2007: 78-46, +19.45 UNITS
2005-2006: 76-64, +7.45 UNITS
2004-2005: 86-76, +1.15 UNITS
2003-2004: 77-68*, +3.10 UNITS
2002-2003: 45-33, +11.50 UNITS
2001-2002: 60-50, +11.60 UNITS
2000-2001: 59-50, +1.80 UNITS
1999-2000: 68-62, +5.50 UNITS
All of these matter when they were doing a full game service. They have honestly become a joke since they started offering packages a year ago. Just like every other service and offering bullshit packages now.
The last 2 years have been pretty horrible. You gotta understand, that record is a little skewed. RAS subscribers are simply not getting down on every good number. It is just not humanly possible to be perfect. Add to this the fact that it seems like half the time, he releases a half point better than is available literally any shop. For example, u76.5 for a 2nd half? I see a 76 total everywhere, which then moves to 75 and 74 with the RAS steam, so getting down at u76 is still good, but when he has all those u76.5s in his record for all those years, he's gonna pick up a few extra units here and there.
I'd honestly like a good explanation though, especially for this year. Why is he going with the 2nd halves? Those great results, those 40 and 60 unit years? Those were all full game college basketball totals. There's a total up for every college basketball game this year, or at least on pinny-based books there's a line for a lot of them.
What happened? Why go against what worked so well for so many years? That's all I'd like to know.
The last 2 years have been pretty horrible. You gotta understand, that record is a little skewed. RAS subscribers are simply not getting down on every good number. It is just not humanly possible to be perfect. Add to this the fact that it seems like half the time, he releases a half point better than is available literally any shop. For example, u76.5 for a 2nd half? I see a 76 total everywhere, which then moves to 75 and 74 with the RAS steam, so getting down at u76 is still good, but when he has all those u76.5s in his record for all those years, he's gonna pick up a few extra units here and there.
I'd honestly like a good explanation though, especially for this year. Why is he going with the 2nd halves? Those great results, those 40 and 60 unit years? Those were all full game college basketball totals. There's a total up for every college basketball game this year, or at least on pinny-based books there's a line for a lot of them.
What happened? Why go against what worked so well for so many years? That's all I'd like to know.
I don't agree that he releases numbers that are not widely available. I have never seen him do that so I will definetly not say that. (Not to mention you can go back and track the line history with all of his releases) In fact I got -5 at one out today on the South Dakota release. And have gotten better numbers for this years second half cbb service as frequently as I've gotten worse numbers. The numbers just move fast but have been very easy to get compared to cfb/cbb in years past. I think that is because there is no set release time so books have no clue when a play may come. Also, subs aren't sitting by the computer all night either like they would be with a set release time.
Results: we are 84 credits into the season and there is no profit. That is not good. Everyone is gonna have to buy more credits in 16 games and it's really fucking hard to justify that when we are already losing.
As for why he's not doing full games, he has a good explanation for that and I don't blame him. Problem though is he will have to go back to that if he's negative with this years second half service, or doesn't show a decent profit.
As for trying to compare RAS to DrH - hahahahaha!!!
That's like comparing gold to fucking silver. If I cared what DrH was doing then I would buy his service. But I don't.
Not being a subscriber but looking at results it is curious to me that 75% of the total plays have been unders given that you have to deal with fouls at the end and possible OT to where you even if you handicap it right you might still lose given those factors. I do realize that the second half is typically lined 10 points higher than the first half so there is that but it seems like they are looking for unders just my observation given the small sample size.
What I'll never understand is how someone can get so upset about a service they choose to pay for. I would understand if this were his first season of recent losing but that's not the case. Just stop using the service.
Hey, some guys are new to the game and expect immediate results for good $$ spent. Plus, emotions run high during the holiday season. Sometimes you make good investments and others well........watch this short clip and see what i mean about investments. No translator needed.
The plays are beyond bad. Not even close. How can you be this bad and have people pay this much?
Was only .500 at 2h plays last year so deciding to base an entire years service around something that is relatively unproven is a gamble. Not looking good for sure so far.
As usual expectations were probably too high for everyone ( myself included ) but most concerning are the blowout losses, no doubt.
Not being a subscriber but looking at results it is curious to me that 75% of the total plays have been unders given that you have to deal with fouls at the end and possible OT to where you even if you handicap it right you might still lose given those factors. I do realize that the second half is typically lined 10 points higher than the first half so there is that but it seems like they are looking for unders just my observation given the small sample size.
there is some sick value on 2h unders in ncaab in certain situations. I bet 65% unders in that market and have crushed for years. The last week was horrendous for 2h total bettors. I went something like 2-18.
i've been on same side as RAS a ton the last week ( usually at a better # though), so I think they just running bad.
Problem with second half unders is you can never stop watching them. Game gets within foul range late and your screwed. OT obviously a major problem too. They have never made much since to me unless the team favored is up really big at halftime. Just to significantly limit your chances of the 2 things I just mentioned. Just don't like them much this year with the shot clock change. Teams get to play a whole half of basketball to figure out the opponents defensive strategies and matchup problems. Now they will be shooting faster with the same efficiency as years prior. I'm not betting any cbb on my own this year, just betting what RAS sends me.
I'm not even familiar with how steam has faired this year so far. The blowout losses are concerning I agree. Most of those have been with the second half under plays I think.
Problem with second half unders is you can never stop watching them. Game gets within foul range late and your screwed. OT obviously a major problem too. They have never made much since to me unless the team favored is up really big at halftime. Just to significantly limit your chances of the 2 things I just mentioned. Just don't like them much this year with the shot clock change. Teams get to play a whole half of basketball to figure out the opponents defensive strategies and matchup problems. Now they will be shooting faster with the same efficiency as years prior. I'm not betting any cbb on my own this year, just betting what RAS sends me.
I'm not even familiar with how steam has faired this year so far. The blowout losses are concerning I agree. Most of those have been with the second half under plays I think.
The hardest to make bets are usually the best ones. But yea ncaab unders are fking lol sometimes. Like u23 1min left, yea i've lost that more than once. Feel like you need a 30pt cushion for last 2minutes to be safe. Nevertheless I've done the best on those of any bet I've ever made, so definitely some value there.
Dunno about how the rule changes affect, was doing really well until a week ago, now around even. I'm not kidding on the 2-18
The hardest to make bets are usually the best ones. But yea ncaab unders are fking lol sometimes. Like u23 1min left, yea i've lost that more than once. Feel like you need a 30pt cushion for last 2minutes to be safe. Nevertheless I've done the best on those of any bet I've ever made, so definitely some value there.
Dunno about how the rule changes affect, was doing really well until a week ago, now around even. I'm not kidding on the 2-18
Mine has been on overs, played an unusually high % of them. I am 20-12-1 vs the 1st half number, then the scoring just stops, 14-19 vs game. Haven't won a single bet that wasn't winning or pushing the 1st half total at halftime so I am missing the other side of those under blowups(but i have been on one under blowup, 9 pts scored in the last 44 sec of a 20+ pt blowout).
Mine has been on overs, played an unusually high % of them. I am 20-12-1 vs the 1st half number, then the scoring just stops, 14-19 vs game. Haven't won a single bet that wasn't winning or pushing the 1st half total at halftime so I am missing the other side of those under blowups(but i have been on one under blowup, 9 pts scored in the last 44 sec of a 20+ pt blowout).
Oh yea I was talking in general. Last week I think every 2h over I had lost badly. Most were games with real fast pace 1h that just died 2h.
For the yeaf full game i've been playing about 50/50 o/u and am around 50%.
Mine has been on overs, played an unusually high % of them. I am 20-12-1 vs the 1st half number, then the scoring just stops, 14-19 vs game. Haven't won a single bet that wasn't winning or pushing the 1st half total at halftime so I am missing the other side of those under blowups(but i have been on one under blowup, 9 pts scored in the last 44 sec of a 20+ pt blowout).
Just got some nice second half luck in North Texas
cdavisubs
Banned
Comments
43-41 and -1.65 units is "beyond bad"? And to answer your question, here is why:
2014-2015: 189-176, -2.85 UNITS
2013-2014: 105-87, +9.55 UNITS
2012-2013: 101-55, +43.00 UNITS
2011-2012: 173-133, +30.05 UNITS
2010-2011: 232-220, -8.60 UNITS
2009-2010: 265-188, +61.10 UNITS
2008-2009: 272-215, +40.85 UNITS
2007-2008: 159-122, +18.45 UNITS
2006-2007: 78-46, +19.45 UNITS
2005-2006: 76-64, +7.45 UNITS
2004-2005: 86-76, +1.15 UNITS
2003-2004: 77-68*, +3.10 UNITS
2002-2003: 45-33, +11.50 UNITS
2001-2002: 60-50, +11.60 UNITS
2000-2001: 59-50, +1.80 UNITS
1999-2000: 68-62, +5.50 UNITS
All of these matter when they were doing a full game service. They have honestly become a joke since they started offering packages a year ago. Just like every other service and offering bullshit packages now.
I'd honestly like a good explanation though, especially for this year. Why is he going with the 2nd halves? Those great results, those 40 and 60 unit years? Those were all full game college basketball totals. There's a total up for every college basketball game this year, or at least on pinny-based books there's a line for a lot of them.
What happened? Why go against what worked so well for so many years? That's all I'd like to know.
bad year for everyone look at drh
Results: we are 84 credits into the season and there is no profit. That is not good. Everyone is gonna have to buy more credits in 16 games and it's really fucking hard to justify that when we are already losing.
Keep your criticism respectful or you will be banned. First and last warning.
You got it.
As for trying to compare RAS to DrH - hahahahaha!!!
That's like comparing gold to fucking silver. If I cared what DrH was doing then I would buy his service. But I don't.
Classic
http://safeshare.tv/w/ZXQqOdKCMp
Was only .500 at 2h plays last year so deciding to base an entire years service around something that is relatively unproven is a gamble. Not looking good for sure so far.
As usual expectations were probably too high for everyone ( myself included ) but most concerning are the blowout losses, no doubt.
there is some sick value on 2h unders in ncaab in certain situations. I bet 65% unders in that market and have crushed for years. The last week was horrendous for 2h total bettors. I went something like 2-18.
i've been on same side as RAS a ton the last week ( usually at a better # though), so I think they just running bad.
I don't think anyones doing real well so far (just a guess)
I'm not even familiar with how steam has faired this year so far. The blowout losses are concerning I agree. Most of those have been with the second half under plays I think.
Opening line killing closing line this year.
The hardest to make bets are usually the best ones. But yea ncaab unders are fking lol sometimes. Like u23 1min left, yea i've lost that more than once. Feel like you need a 30pt cushion for last 2minutes to be safe. Nevertheless I've done the best on those of any bet I've ever made, so definitely some value there.
Dunno about how the rule changes affect, was doing really well until a week ago, now around even. I'm not kidding on the 2-18
Mine has been on overs, played an unusually high % of them. I am 20-12-1 vs the 1st half number, then the scoring just stops, 14-19 vs game. Haven't won a single bet that wasn't winning or pushing the 1st half total at halftime so I am missing the other side of those under blowups(but i have been on one under blowup, 9 pts scored in the last 44 sec of a 20+ pt blowout).
Oh yea I was talking in general. Last week I think every 2h over I had lost badly. Most were games with real fast pace 1h that just died 2h.
For the yeaf full game i've been playing about 50/50 o/u and am around 50%.
Does that mean steam has been getting killed?
Just got some nice second half luck in North Texas
as of 12/22/2015 only steam sides are showing a profit... (512 sides played, 636 totals played)