Buffettgambler NBA/College Sports Thread
buffettgambler
Senior Handicapper
Will post some stuff periodically
NBA 11/13
703 Hou/Phi Over 206 -110
706 Cha/Bos Under 193 -110
NBA 11/13
703 Hou/Phi Over 206 -110
706 Cha/Bos Under 193 -110
Comments
402 SDST/HAW Under 59 -110
319 Indiana +27 -110
341 Michigan/Northwestern Over 49 -110
166 Utah St -7 -107
204 Mississippi +3 -117
207 Boise State -7 -110
NCAAF YTD 1-2 -1.1
NCAAF 11/23
121 Pittsburgh +1 -110
328 Ark/LSU Under 54.5 -110
NCAAF 11/30
359 Purdue +21 -110
391 Baylor -11.5 -110
YTD 3-4 -1.37
NCAAF 11/30
371 South Alabama -7 -110
And to continued success!
And to continued success! 💵
701 Atl/Was Over 192.5 -110
2-0 +2
NCAAF 11/30
399 Penn State +25 -110
127 Ohio State -5 -110
YTD: 6-6 -.57
712 Ind/Utah Under 189 -110
YTD: 3-0 +3
NBA 12/4
714 Minnesota +3.5 -110
4.5 seems way out of line with recent minnesota prices. What's going on?
Game is in Mexico City.
74ec336f831901a00dcfbc2a8fa6ec19f5001cb8c9daa4ab6adc5aafe7f7b4a9.jpg
is this why?
quick question: when the market moves against you as it has here, do you lose confidence and/or reconsider your valuations? I'm am new to the nba and am very unfamiliar with the market and what drives price changes at different times.
thanks for sharing and gl
ah, lol that would explain it, thanks
3's were baseline, so the move up to 4.5's-5's is a move out of market range. The in-game matchup should be supportive towards any move off baseline towards the Wolves, and this is not a typical style play to which the market will stretch out the Spurs valuation.
This may be the onset of a market attempt to stick a new valuation the Wolves since the market value and quality of play by the Wolves is really starting to diverge.
Market moves against effect timing more than valuation. It may be time be taking a more cynical approach to moves of out of market range that don't appear to be onsets of structural shifts on market valuations. Atl/Was market move on the total the other day was a good example. If market moves appear to be structural, I will reassess.
Well given market recency on after-effects of end of game quality drop and the over used inefficient tempo disparity relative to non-end-of-game situational variance not sure I agree with your assessment on the "new valuation" of this team.
Thanks in advance for the help.
I believe he was speaking in Spanish since the game is in Mexico City.
I'm with Lancer--I often feel I need an interpreter after reading some of BG's explanations and the resulting concomitant responses
Market valuations can be derived from closing spreads in recent games. Consider a basic example with a league of 3 teams all playing neutral site games. On Monday A is -4 vs B. On Tuesday B is -3 vs C. From this would infer that the market suggests A is around 7 pts better than C. Obviously this doesn't take into account a myriad of other factors one would need in order to make an informed wager. However it's a useful tool to see how market valuations are changing on specific teams over time.