First half plays vs full game plays
zkc100
Member
I have a question?idea for someone that may have the data to run a historical analysis. In the past week or so we've been burnt alot on Ed's totals by the fouling at the end of games and the OT bad luck. Alot of our unders look like they would have been hitting in the first half. In previous season's i have felt like the second half fouling was helping a bunch of our overs. Can someone run any kind of historical analysis of first half lines/scores? If we took all the unders for the first half, to take out that fouling element of chance and OT. But also took all your overs for the game, so we could sometimes catch a break with that stuff. I wonder what the record would look like? Thanks for any comments, but i think this could be a really good idea.
Comments
Ed has spoke about this a few times. It can also be another way to get money down on games
the 1st halves have been a little better over the last 3 years but its close..i feel thell stay a little higher very small % ..just getting the best line is more important nomatter which one you bet..if you have a partner id say bet them both..
48 points in UL Lafayette with 8 minutes left in 1H.
54 points in UL Lafayette with 3 minutes left in 1H.
Frackin' unreal.
1st half overs, game goes over 72.7% this year, 75.6% last 5 years.
1st half unders, games goes under 73.6% this year, 74.4% last 5 years.
Surprisingly, the overs falling apart in the 2nd half show more of a difference than the foul fests killing unders in the 2nd half(less than 1% difference).