Produce
Produce · Banned
About
- Username
- Produce
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- Roles
- Banned Users
Comments
-
Brians, I don't want to moderate the things that happen on this board. So keep your vote
-
homer, I had to spend a day in Pitt this last week. I believe I might have been on the wrong side of the tracks for most of it. Are there areas of Pitt the locals don't even go to?
-
(Quote) actually Ed, as usual, it's not even close to "similar guidelines" The most plays you posted in any of those 4 years was 61, and you averaged 50. You are asking me to play 200. Also, you hitting 53% for the last 12 years is a los…
-
Good deal Okie. I'm headed to bed soon. We can sort out the details later.
-
Ed, It was your idea to turn this into a service issue. I'm not posting plays the night before, I'm not forcing myself into 200 plays, I'm not falling into you doing what you've always done with challenges, which is make it your guidelines or nothi…
-
the choices of moderators might be questionable as well. There seem to be quite a few possible choices of people that seem a little more responsible and neutral than the people that were picked.
-
Ed, How about 201 plays and I have to earn more than 13.1 units Basically I have to do better than you have for the last 4 years. I value my plays the same way I always have 1,2,3 units. I'll play only full game sides and totals, even though I …
-
I agree 100% Cream. You seem to be one of the smarter posters around these days
-
cream, I'm sorry I didn't even see your post. Lets say the following happens: Challenger: Nets a Mythical Profit of $900 You: Net a Mythical Profit of $1,500 You would win your 1,500....his original 1,000, and his 900 (assuming he actually sends …
-
It's only $1000 if the other player loses money. You stand to gain much more if both players are winning players. If you're going to post your plays regardless, what's the difference if it's in a thread with me or on your own post. $1,000 extra at …
-
(Quote) awesome post!
-
Betatl, Excellent post and thanks for the response. All of those reasons might be exactly why no one has excepted the challenge. I'm willing to vary with the terms of the deal. I just offered to ship the $1,000 up front to ease concerns of final …
-
Is this unreasonable? I'm curious as to why no one is interested in this idea
-
I wonder what percentage of posters on this board know what edge they need to have to place a bet of -140 I'd say less than 5%
-
I thought it was too and I'm surprised none of the big shots from the board have taken me up on it. I'm sure they don't think I'm a better handicapper than they are, so there's really no good reason not to do it. If it's the terms of the deal, I'm w…
-
58% to win and you're laying -140 ut oh.....
-
<this guy?
-
oh, it's because no one wants to break gambling laws. Didn't even consider that on a gambling website
-
5 hours later and no responses? I figured I've have 3-4 bets by this time. Bad terms? Too much/little money? Football not your sport?
-
Homer, where in PA. Are you. I'm all over PA for the next few days
-
This is comedy gold!
-
Homer, where are you in P.A. ?
-
The milk's gone bad!
-
W2W, Brians, and Rudy.....
-
obviously games were in 2008, not 2009, sorry about that. Couldn't post direct links due to it being from a competing website
-
12/7/09 Philly 20 NYG 14 12/15/09 Philly 30 Cleveland 10 (spread 16, covered) NYG were defending champs right?
-
Colorado lost for Brmapes and his system. If you look at the Philly series, they won earlier in the home stand against Boston which won the unit for me and everyone else. But this isn't about me because I didn't post my plays this year, so I'm 0-0 …
-
Just for the record, the "home team system" is not down any units, in fact it's cruising right along as it has for the last 10 years. Brmapes added plays, I believe it was betting against poor road teams, is where the units were lost. J…
-
I believe Warren Buffet said it best....(quote in my sig)
-
I agree 100%.