Betting Talk

Who should lead push for legal sports betting?

TortugaTortuga Moderator
edited August 2015 in Sports Betting
http://www.legalsportsreport.com/3022/sports-betting-legalization-push-needs-leader/

I'd like to nominate myself. Tortuga 2016. Any other nominations for a leader?
«1

Comments

  • worm33worm33 Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    Tortuga wrote: »
    http://www.legalsportsreport.com/3022/sports-betting-legalization-push-needs-leader/

    I'd like to nominate myself. Tortuga 2016. Any other nominations for a leader?

    Kind of an interesting topic. Is there any pros out there who doesn't want it to be legalized? Personally I'm on the fence.
  • RightAngleRightAngle Admin
    edited August 2015
    worm33 wrote: »
    Kind of an interesting topic. Is there any pros out there who doesn't want it to be legalized? Personally I'm on the fence.

    It would depend on how it happens, but would legalization stop bookies anyway? Might take some square action away but there will still be a big demand. Seems like there are a lot of bookies in Vegas.
  • winner_13winner_13 Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    Why would pros not want it to be legalized?
    Wouldn't sportsbooks be getting more square action?
  • Walt's WharfWalt's Wharf Member
    edited August 2015
    If individual states could operate their own sportsbooks, similar to lotteries, that would be very interesting. The offshore line on a Dolphins game could be Miami -2.5, and then in Florida, maybe you'd see some Dolphins -3.5's or something crazy.

    Would need to make friends in 21 other states or maybe call up some forgotten family members. :laughing:
  • Obi OneObi One Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    Am I asking too much if the push for legalisation goes accompanied with a push for regulation of the bookies?

    No more discriminating dual lines, no more limits on winning accounts, etc etc. Also payout has to be within 3/5 days.
  • TortugaTortuga Moderator
    edited August 2015
    winner_13 wrote: »
    Why would pros not want it to be legalized?
    Wouldn't sportsbooks be getting more square action?

    I'm not seeing many downsides. Widespread legalization could lead to more competitive lines, higher limits and more diverse offerings.
  • winner_13winner_13 Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    Obi One wrote: »
    Am I asking too much if the push for legalisation goes accompanied with a push for regulation of the bookies?

    No more discriminating dual lines, no more limits on winning accounts, etc etc. Also payout has to be within 3/5 days.

    I doubt this gets regulated.
    I may be way off but I compare it to - do casinos allow one to count in blackjack?
  • RonbetsRonbets Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    You wanna get gouged? Careful what you ask for. Btw, see if Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi will give you a line of credit.
  • procapprocap Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    I'm embarrassed to admit I don't follow this stuff as closely as I should. If betting does become legal, does anyone envision a scenario where it's for professional sports only? I just can't see the NCAA ever being open to legal betting, but maybe I'm being naive...
  • Old-TimerOld-Timer Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    Tortuga wrote: »
    I'm not seeing many downsides. Widespread legalization could lead to more competitive lines, higher limits and more diverse offerings.

    We live in the same world and with the same government and you don't see any downside. Lets leave well enough alone.

    Am I asking too much if the push for legalisation goes accompanied with a push for regulation of the bookies?
    No more discriminating dual lines, no more limits on winning accounts, etc etc. Also payout has to be within 3/5 days.


    there in the business of making money as you are. IMO you are asking to much but lots of luck. This industry has changed like no other over the past 10/15 years and it's not going to get any better.


    Neteller/Pinny

    <iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3un5f6qLi_k"; frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  • TortugaTortuga Moderator
    edited August 2015
    Old-Timer wrote: »
    We live in the same world and with the same government and you don't see any downside. Lets leave well enough alone.

    My thinking is that it would be similar to marijuana legalization. There's still dealers doing business as usual, but there's also a legal, regulated option. A rising tide lifts all boats.
  • Walt's WharfWalt's Wharf Member
    edited August 2015
    procap wrote: »
    I'm embarrassed to admit I don't follow this stuff as closely as I should. If betting does become legal, does anyone envision a scenario where it's for professional sports only? I just can't see the NCAA ever being open to legal betting, but maybe I'm being naive...

    You don't see the NCAA being open to betting? Wait until every college football stadium in the country has a DraftKings or FanDuel ad plastered on its video boards and along the sidelines. Oh, wait, I keep forgetting that DFS isn't betting.

    There will come a point in time where everything needs to be clarified legally in the courts, especially as daily fantasy continues to operate within the fringes as it currently does.
  • BetThemDogsBetThemDogs Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    If the states legalize it they will rake off too much-- just like they do with the lottery. -120 on both sides?
  • Obi OneObi One Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    winner_13 wrote: »
    I doubt this gets regulated.
    I may be way off but I compare it to - do casinos allow one to count in blackjack?

    A bit off indeed, here are my arguments:

    BlackJack is a game of chance with a negative expected value. How negative depends on the rules imposed by the casino's. By card counting (which is a skill), it's still a game of chance, but now with a positive expected value. I can totally understand why a casino do not allow it.

    Poker is a game of skill, just like sportsbetting. Therefore, if you offer a game of skill under certain rules to one crowd, in my opinion, a sports book shouldn't be able to discriminate the group that is more adept than the other. Are they barring Phil Ivey from the table? Negreanu? Hellmuth? No they're actually icons within the poker world.

    edit: I doubt it gets regulated too, just can't stand the hypocrisy.
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited August 2015
    worm33 wrote: »
    Kind of an interesting topic. Is there any pros out there who doesn't want it to be legalized? Personally I'm on the fence.

    I'm on the fence as well. Way too many questions of how it would be run. After reading many of the proponents in Congress also want to outlaw it online, be careful what you wish for.
  • duritodurito Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    worm33 wrote: »
    Kind of an interesting topic. Is there any pros out there who doesn't want it to be legalized? Personally I'm on the fence.

    I can't see it being done in a manner that would make it real attractive. Maybe at first, but eventually it will be a bunch of Will Hill's that kick you out after making $12.

    Offshores would surely be banned, it's not like you could suddenly play at pinny.
    winner_13 wrote: »
    Why would pros not want it to be legalized?
    Wouldn't sportsbooks be getting more square action?

    The get tons of it in the UK and still ban anyone with a clue.
    Tortuga wrote: »
    I'm not seeing many downsides. Widespread legalization could lead to more competitive lines, higher limits and more diverse offerings.

    Why? It's not like this in most places it's regulated in now. The UK ran off pinny, etc. and the big british books are jokes.
  • KashmirKashmir Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    If the states legalize it they will rake off too much-- just like they do with the lottery. -120 on both sides?

    This is what i've always thought. The states take 50% handle when they rip off the public in their lotteries. Why would anyone think they would simply keep it at -110, let alone -105.
  • kcburghkcburgh Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    Kashmir wrote: »
    This is what i've always thought. The states take 50% handle when they rip off the public in their lotteries. Why would anyone think they would simply keep it at -110, let alone -105.

    see Delaware parlays and teasers only..
  • lumpy19lumpy19 Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    I'd rather it stays in the gray area it's in now
  • lakemonsterlakemonster Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    Ronbets wrote: »
    You wanna get gouged? Careful what you ask for. Btw, see if Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi will give you a line of credit.

    what the fuck does this even mean?

    if its legalized, broke ass degens won't be able to get credit? what an indictment on legalization...LOL
  • lakemonsterlakemonster Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    what about a matchbook-type setup? no liability for the "house" since 1-2% is charged for every winning and losing bet. if the liquidity is there, it seems like a win/win for everybody - pros included.
  • duritodurito Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    what about a matchbook-type setup? no liability for the "house" since 1-2% is charged for every winning and losing bet. if the liquidity is there, it seems like a win/win for everybody - pros included.

    betfair premium charge, thefts, etc.... they might be the biggest criminal book in the world. i'll still with the third world bookies
  • lakemonsterlakemonster Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    durito wrote: »
    betfair premium charge, thefts, etc.... they might be the biggest criminal book in the world. i'll still with the third world bookies

    Can you translate? I guess I'm in the dark as to what you are referencing in regards to betfair...
  • RonbetsRonbets Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    what the fuck does this even mean?

    if its legalized, broke ass degens won't be able to get credit? what an indictment on legalization...LOL

    Why bring this minority group into the scheme of things? Is this part of your peer circle? Credit is essential in most forms of business.
  • lakemonsterlakemonster Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    Ronbets wrote: »
    Why bring this minority group into the scheme of things? Is this part of your peer circle? Credit is essential in most forms of business.

    My peer circle? LOL! You don't know me buddy, so don't make derogatory assumptions...

    Plenty of pros bet in Vegas without credit. Its only essential if you like playing above your your bankroll - the equivalent to trading stocks on margin. And playing above your bankroll is a very dangerous game to play...
  • lumpy19lumpy19 Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    My peer circle? LOL! You don't know me buddy, so don't make derogatory assumptions...

    Plenty of pros bet in Vegas without credit. Its only essential if you like playing above your your bankroll - the equivalent to trading stocks on margin. And playing above your bankroll is a very dangerous game to play...

    Lots of other reasons for credit besides that.
  • lakemonsterlakemonster Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    Ronbets wrote: »
    You wanna get gouged? Careful what you ask for. Btw, see if Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi will give you a line of credit.

    After reading this again, you weren't so much fearful of of the credit market drying up - it was just thinly veiled liberal bashing.

    Maybe one of the good guys like Rubio, Ted Cruz or Lindsey Graham will give you that line of credit...
    :idoit:
  • lakemonsterlakemonster Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    lumpy19 wrote: »
    Lots of other reasons for credit besides that.

    Scalping / middling? That can be done without credit as well. Its just not as convenient...
  • RonbetsRonbets Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    My peer circle? LOL! You don't know me buddy, so don't make derogatory assumptions...

    I know what I read about in your posts and am not impressed.

    Plenty of pros bet in Vegas without credit. Its only essential if you like playing above your your bankroll - the equivalent to trading stocks on margin. And playing above your bankroll is a very dangerous game to play...

    WTF do you know about pros
    betting and where? Legalization would fit you fine as a recreational player. What's the difference to you laying 1.15 or 1.05? Huh?



    What sources r u using?
  • duritodurito Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    Scalping / middling? That can be done without credit as well. Its just not as convenient...

    Futures
Sign In or Register to comment.