I really don't GAF what you bet. You action would be welcome in my circles. I simply consider you a data miner that finally has seen the light on the CLV perks. Took you a while.
Seen the light? My opinion is the same. You don't need CLV to win. I never said it isn't good to have +CLV. I just disagree with the people who think you can't win without it or your future results will suffer. If you told me I could have +CLV on every bet, I'd take it, but I don't write off bets just because I have -CLV like some people. Maybe if my personal results with -CLV were bad, I'd think differently about it.
Far from a data miner. Making a model and data mining are totally different and even then I have never blindly played a model in my life.
Comments
Seen the light? My opinion is the same. You don't need CLV to win. I never said it isn't good to have +CLV. I just disagree with the people who think you can't win without it or your future results will suffer. If you told me I could have +CLV on every bet, I'd take it, but I don't write off bets just because I have -CLV like some people. Maybe if my personal results with -CLV were bad, I'd think differently about it.
Far from a data miner. Making a model and data mining are totally different and even then I have never blindly played a model in my life.
You can check all the retractable roof joints here.
http://stadiumroofstatus.com/allstadiums.php