Betting Talk

March Plays

j2037j2037 Senior Member
edited March 2015 in Sports Betting
712 uva/cuse un60.5 2h
«1

Comments

  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    705 golden st -6 2h
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    703 phx -3.5 2h
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    718 iowa st -7 2h
    717 ok/iowa st ov77 2h
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    716 vt -3 2h
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    updated record:
    cbb 28-18 +8.2u
    nba 7-3 +3.7u
  • cpech56cpech56 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    Can you explain why you and a few others feel the need to start new threads monthly, and others weekly? It's like trying to fit two dicks in one coke bottle to piss, it's just uncalled for and awkward.
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    548 texas am/florida un124.5
  • GoatsGoats Head Moderator
    edited March 2015
    cpech56 wrote: »
    Can you explain why you and a few others feel the need to start new threads monthly, and others weekly? It's like trying to fit two dicks in one coke bottle to piss, it's just uncalled for and awkward.

    You're of course welcome to your opinion, but just so everyone is clear, it's perfectly acceptable to use weekly, monthly, or season-long threads.

    FWIW, I personally don't have much of a preference. I think one benefit of starting new threads either weekly or monthly is to keep the thread from getting incredibly long in case anyone (including the OP) wants to go back through the thread in search of something.

    Also, and my apologies for violating this myself, this is the Picks Only forum. You really should have posted this as a stand alone topic in the General forum.
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    thank you goats. i didn't notice any sort of consistency between the other posters. i play any and all markets so i thought putting them all together for the month would be the most convenient. i agree it makes it easier to search back for certain plays. some forum software has a habit of running slow if the thread is ginormous. not saying that's the case here. just playing it safe. sorry for any drama i may have caused.
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    511 mil/den ov192
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    710 cha/brk un192
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    544 kansas -7.5 2h
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    updated record:
    cbb 29-19 +8.1u
    nba 8-3 +4.7u
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    710 brklyn tt un99.5
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    757 utah st +6.5
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    703 phx/orl ov201.5
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    756 cin/tulsa un118.5
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    765 tcu +8.5
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    i will now be keeping a weighted record in the NBA for when i play the full game total and team total(s).

    703 phx tt ov102.5
    704 orl tt ov98
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    736 la salle/st joe un123
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    727 osu/psu ov129.5
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    736 lasalle/st joe un66.5 2h
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    756 cin/tulsa un64 2h
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    updated record:
    cbb 34-21 +10.9u
    nba 6-4 +1.6u --- 6-0 +6u --- 12-4 +7.6u

    i decided i will keep a separate record for nba team totals. the records above are for sides/totals, team totals, and then everything combined.
  • GoatsGoats Head Moderator
    edited March 2015
    j2037 wrote: »
    updated record:
    cbb 34-21 +10.9u
    nba 6-4 +1.6u --- 6-0 +6u --- 12-4 +7.6u

    i decided i will keep a separate record for nba team totals. the records above are for sides/totals, team totals, and then everything combined.

    Sorry for not chiming in sooner but I agree TT's should be kept separately. One request, could you just put TT or something in front of your TT record so it's clear what "nba 6-4 +1.6u --- 6-0 +6u --- 12-4 +7.6u" means? It won't be obvious if someone hasn't read your above explanation and obviously you don't want to have to repeat it. I'd do something like this, but the formatting isn't really important...

    cbb 34-21 +10.9u
    nba 6-4 +1.6u
    nba tt's 6-0 +6u
    nba total 12-4 +7.6u

    Thanks for taking the time to both follow the guidelines and maintain a transparent record. Not only will it help anyone interested in your plays (one of the main reasons we have guidelines), but it makes the mods' job a lot easier. Continued success!

    P.S. You might also consider separating out your 2H's. I've always felt the more a record is broken down the better. Once a sample size starts to become relevant, it helps indicate if a capper is stronger in certain markets than others.
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    508 temple/east car un122
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    Goats wrote: »
    Sorry for not chiming in sooner but I agree TT's should be kept separately. One request, could you just put TT or something in front of your TT record so it's clear what "nba 6-4 +1.6u --- 6-0 +6u --- 12-4 +7.6u" means? It won't be obvious if someone hasn't read your above explanation and obviously you don't want to have to repeat it. I'd do something like this, but the formatting isn't really important...

    cbb 34-21 +10.9u
    nba 6-4 +1.6u
    nba tt's 6-0 +6u
    nba total 12-4 +7.6u

    Thanks for taking the time to both follow the guidelines and maintain a transparent record. Not only will it help anyone interested in your plays (one of the main reasons we have guidelines), but it makes the mods' job a lot easier. Continued success!

    P.S. You might also consider separating out your 2H's. I've always felt the more a record is broken down the better. Once a sample size starts to become relevant, it helps indicate if a capper is stronger in certain markets than others.

    goats, thank you for taking the time to provide feedback. i will add tt so it is clear what the reocord is for. your formatting looks great, i think i will just do it that way :) like you mentioned once my sample size is relevant i will start breaking it down. there just aren't enough plays right now for any of it to mean anything. have a good one
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    823 dal/gs ov207
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    814 memphis -8 2h
  • j2037j2037 Senior Member
    edited March 2015
    556 rutgers/mich un123.5
Sign In or Register to comment.