Respect for bumping old threads to update losers. Most everyone else on the innerwebs would have let 'em die.
Thx. That's the biggest flaw of the bt board, recordkeeping should be mandatory. As it stands, one could update a previous day's/week's/month's results when positive, while just simply choosing not to post records when losses show up over similar timeframes. Although I did learn today that 1u on the board = $100......"so there's that" - Jesse Pinkman
Thx. That's the biggest flaw of the bt board, recordkeeping should be mandatory. As it stands, one could update a previous day's/week's/month's results when positive, while just simply choosing not to post records when losses show up over similar timeframes. Although I did learn today that 1u on the board = $100......"so there's that" - Jesse Pinkman
Why, to make it easier for all those who won't/can't do their own work to find the best coattails to ride? People post picks for a variety of reasons, some care about whether the posted stuff wins, some don't. The current board policy works just fine for all of them.
Comments
0-1, -1.73u
Thx. That's the biggest flaw of the bt board, recordkeeping should be mandatory. As it stands, one could update a previous day's/week's/month's results when positive, while just simply choosing not to post records when losses show up over similar timeframes. Although I did learn today that 1u on the board = $100......"so there's that" - Jesse Pinkman
Why, to make it easier for all those who won't/can't do their own work to find the best coattails to ride? People post picks for a variety of reasons, some care about whether the posted stuff wins, some don't. The current board policy works just fine for all of them.
924 CHISOX +112
Good luck.