Betting Talk

CBK picks thread week of 1/17-1/23

StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
edited January 2011 in Sports Betting
<table width="416" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><col style="width: 48pt;" width="64"> <col style="width: 30pt;" width="40"> <col style="width: 32pt;" width="42"> <col style="width: 35pt;" width="46"> <col style="width: 62pt;" width="83" span="2"> <col style="width: 44pt;" width="58"> <tbody><tr style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17"> <td style="height: 12.75pt; width: 48pt;" width="64" height="17">
</td> <td class="xl26" style="width: 30pt;" width="40">WIN</td> <td class="xl26" style="width: 32pt;" width="42">LOSS</td> <td class="xl26" style="width: 35pt;" width="46">PUSH</td> <td class="xl26" style="width: 62pt;" width="83"> WIN %</td> <td class="xl26" style="width: 62pt;" width="83"> ADJ %</td> <td class="xl29" style="width: 44pt;" width="58"> UNITS</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17"> <td class="xl24" style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17">NFL</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">21</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">12</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">0</td> <td class="xl25" align="right">63.6%</td> <td class="xl28" align="right">64.4%</td> <td class="xl31" align="right">+8.35</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17"> <td class="xl27" style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17">NHL</td> <td class="xl27" align="right">52</td> <td class="xl27" align="right">52</td> <td class="xl27" align="right">0</td> <td class="xl28" align="right">50.0%</td> <td class="xl28" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">55.8%</td> <td class="xl30" align="right">+7.40</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17"> <td class="xl27" style="height: 12.75pt; border-top: medium none;" height="17">NBA</td> <td class="xl27" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">38</td> <td class="xl27" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">36</td> <td class="xl27" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">0</td> <td class="xl28" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">51.4%</td> <td class="xl28" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">51.4%</td> <td class="xl30" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">-1.60</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17"> <td style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17">CBK</td> <td align="right">59</td> <td align="right">47</td> <td align="right">3</td> <td class="xl32" align="right">55.7%</td> <td class="xl33" align="right">55.7%</td> <td class="xl34" align="right">+7.30</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17"> <td class="xl27" style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17">MLB</td> <td class="xl27" align="right">32</td> <td class="xl27" align="right">31</td> <td class="xl27" align="right">1</td> <td class="xl28" align="right">50.8%</td> <td class="xl28" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">54.7%</td> <td class="xl30" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">+3.03</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17"> <td class="xl24" style="height: 12.75pt; border-top: medium none;" height="17">CFB</td> <td class="xl24" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">52</td> <td class="xl24" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">45</td> <td class="xl24" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">1</td> <td class="xl25" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">53.6%</td> <td class="xl28" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">53.6%</td> <td class="xl31" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">+2.40</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17"> <td class="xl24" style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17">TOTAL</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">254</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">223</td> <td class="xl24" align="right">5</td> <td class="xl25" align="right">53.2%</td> <td class="xl25" style="border-top: medium none;" align="right">55.1%</td> <td class="xl35" align="right">+26.88</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
«1

Comments

  • kass101kass101 Senior Member
    edited January 2011
    Great work Stevie.
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    CBK 1/17

    728 U Conn -1.5 Villanova
    739 Loyola MD +3.5 St Peters
  • newcombenewcombe Senior Member
    edited January 2011
    as always, nice to see the updated numbers above and the units continuing to go in the positive direction. look at your picks daily for help on my own...
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    Added 1/17

    742 Siena/Canisius OV 136.5
    762 Prairie View/Jackson St OV 122.5
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    CBK 1/18

    526 Alabama/Kentucky OV 131.5
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    CBK 1/19

    732 Towson -2 William & Mary
    807 Air Force +19.5 San Diego St
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    Added 1/19

    736 Notre Dame/Cincinnati OV 130.5
    758 Delaware/Northeaster UN 130.5
    772 Charlotte/U Mass OV 130.5
    Not a misprint, they are all lined at 130.5 at The Greek. :)
  • dtrain11dtrain11 Senior Member
    edited January 2011
    Great Value on Delaware Stevie
  • utixutix Banned
    edited January 2011
    So far it's pretty damn good value on all of them!
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    I cringe when I see that. Not a good history.
  • cabster13cabster13 Senior Member
    edited January 2011
    StevieY wrote: »
    CBK 1/19

    732 Towson -2 William & Mary
    807 Air Force +19.5 San Diego St

    Any idea if a key player was missing tonight for Towson. I don't follow them but a -2 play and they trail by 24 will 11 to go??
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    No, they just suck.
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    CBK 1/20

    569 Tennessee Tech +14 Austin Peay
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    Added 1/20

    536 UC Riverside/Cal Poly OV 117.5
    544 USC/Stanford OV 117.5
    560 The Citadel/Appalachian St OV 138.5
  • peacemakerpeacemaker Senior Member
    edited January 2011
    No, they just suck.

    Great reply. Best of luck tonight...
  • Focused1Focused1 Banned
    edited January 2011
    StevieY wrote: »
    CBK 1/20

    569 Tennessee Tech +14 Austin Peay

    Nice call here StevieY, gotta love getting +14 and winning the game outright!
  • kass101kass101 Senior Member
    edited January 2011
    Stevie, I had the App State play as well. No matter who they play it seems they just dont want to play defense at all.
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    They actually have been a little better defensively overall lately but still below average. When you are below average defensively, don't force many turnovers, and you speed up all your opponents, points are going to be scored. They didn't speed up TC tonight and they forced a decent turnover %, but they got shredded.
  • kass101kass101 Senior Member
    edited January 2011
    good to know, I wasnt able to see any of the game.
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    CBK 1/21

    826 Canisius/Fairfield OV 124.5
  • DustinYoungDustinYoung Member
    edited January 2011
    Question of the day:

    Can you please tell me the last time Nebraska was a road favorite in-conference? Thank you :).

    Goats, please email me whenever you get a chance.
  • newcombenewcombe Senior Member
    edited January 2011
    Question of the day:

    Can you please tell me the last time Nebraska was a road favorite in-conference? Thank you :).

    Goats, please email me whenever you get a chance.

    i don't know but I already got a little on the skers...
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    CBK 1/22

    605 Columbia +4.5 Cornell
    640 Penn -1.5 St Josephs
    641 Fordham +17.5 Dayton
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    Added 1/22

    672 Colorado St/BYU UN 155

    Probably more later.
  • EscootEscoot Senior Member
    edited January 2011
    Great run StevieY, especially in CBB, since that is what I follow the closest.

    Are you hoping CSU realizes their strength with the front court in this game and slows this down? Tough for me to play BYU unders, especially against a team like CSU that doesn't mind getting into a 3 point shooting contest. Interested in your thoughts?
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    CSU does a good job of not letting the pace get away. Overall they are neutral pace wise, but they make slower teams play a little faster and fast teams play a little slower. They have only gone over 70 possessions once in their last 8 games, and that was more so because both teams shot the lights out. Teams shooting well can make the pace look a little faster because the average possession length drops because of it, not many offensive rebounds to prolong possessions. This one is probably going over 70 but a 73 possession game(where BYU wants it) means the teams need to combine for 2.12 pts per possession. Both teams play pretty good defense(CSU about average but getting better, BYU top 30). Outside of Ferdette going crazy, I like it.
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    Added 1/22

    711 Tennessee Tech +6 Tennessee St

    706 Tennessee Martin/E Illinois OV 130.5
  • TnbreakersTnbreakers Member
    edited January 2011
    Thanks for the plays. Been following as of late and appreciate your insight. Is there any of your plays posted today you feel stronger towards? Thanks.
  • StevieYStevieY Senior Handicapper
    edited January 2011
    Tnbreakers wrote: »
    Thanks for the plays. Been following as of late and appreciate your insight. Is there any of your plays posted today you feel stronger towards? Thanks.

    Nothing stands out today. Didn't like the card much today. The game I played today that I like the most was Oakland U/N Dakota St UN 167 but that got hammered down 4 points right before I could post it.
  • TnbreakersTnbreakers Member
    edited January 2011
    Thanks. I follow the OVC and really like the Tn Tech play. Good Luck!
Sign In or Register to comment.