1. #31
    Senior Member Old-Timer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    9,356
    Thanks
    6,775
    Thanked 5,278 Times in 3,598 Posts

    Default

    Record
    5/18 4-0 +4.00
    5/19 0-1 <1.20>
    5/20 2-1 +1.05
    5/21 2-1 +0.80
    5/22 7-0 +7.00
    5/23 4-2 +1.70

    Total 19-5 +13.35

    #952 Under 26.5 -115 Ari/Milw Lose <1.20> (Hope someone found a 27)
    #954 Under 26.5 -110 S.Diego/Wash Win +1.00
    #956 Under 27 -110 Atl/Philly Win +1.00
    #962 Under 24.5 -110 LAD/Colo Win +1.00
    #971 Over 28 -110 Balt/CWS Win +1.00
    #973 Over 26.5 - 110 Sea/Oakland Lose <1.10>

  2. Thanks:

    The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Old-Timer For This Useful Post:

    bluejake (05-24-2018),  BuckyBadger (05-24-2018),  bumpo (05-24-2018),  golfguru1 (05-24-2018),  hornsfan (05-24-2018),  megapowers88 (05-24-2018)  

  3. #32
    Senior Member Old-Timer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    9,356
    Thanks
    6,775
    Thanked 5,278 Times in 3,598 Posts

    Default

    Thursday 5/24

    Just one for today

    #908 Under 28-110 CWS/Balt

  4. Thanks:

    The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Old-Timer For This Useful Post:

    ct5320 (05-24-2018),  golfguru1 (05-24-2018),  hornsfan (05-24-2018)  

  5. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,509
    Thanks
    349
    Thanked 1,527 Times in 916 Posts

    Default

    Hey OT, nice job! Curious if you are following full game totals with the RHE. Meaning, are the full games agreeing with the outcome of the RHE, win or lose?

    They all did yesterday, for example (Under 24.5 -110 LAD/Colo Win +1.00 ) also went under game total.

    I know the RHE is derived from game total so if almost all are agreeing, win or lose, with the outcome of game total....wouldn't it be just as beneficial to play full games in accordance with the way you are playing the RHE? Limits are more for sure. Full game total $5000 RHE $500 from what I can tell at BOL

    Just wasn't sure if you tracked them against full game total for the season. (the RHE games you played). Keep it going.

  6. #34
    Senior Member bumpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    wi
    Posts
    353
    Thanks
    1,832
    Thanked 102 Times in 80 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Old-Timer View Post
    Thursday 5/24

    Just one for today

    #908 Under 28-110 CWS/Balt
    Wow. Had this one graded a loss an hour ago. Sweet!

  7. Thanks:

    The Following User Says Thank You to bumpo For This Useful Post:

    megapowers88 (05-24-2018)  

  8. #35
    Senior Member Old-Timer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    9,356
    Thanks
    6,775
    Thanked 5,278 Times in 3,598 Posts

    Default

    I was just going to say everyone who thought it was a loser after the 2nd inning raise your hand. Remember well I'm not going to kid anyone we got lucky but we get lucky and unlucky all the time. Glad this one went our way.

  9. Thanks:

    The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Old-Timer For This Useful Post:

    bumpo (05-24-2018),  golfguru1 (05-24-2018),  munson15 (05-27-2018)  

  10. #36
    Senior Member Old-Timer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    9,356
    Thanks
    6,775
    Thanked 5,278 Times in 3,598 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ebemiss View Post
    Hey OT, nice job! Curious if you are following full game totals with the RHE. Meaning, are the full games agreeing with the outcome of the RHE, win or lose?

    They all did yesterday, for example (Under 24.5 -110 LAD/Colo Win +1.00 ) also went under game total.

    I know the RHE is derived from game total so if almost all are agreeing, win or lose, with the outcome of game total....wouldn't it be just as beneficial to play full games in accordance with the way you are playing the RHE? Limits are more for sure. Full game total $5000 RHE $500 from what I can tell at BOL

    Just wasn't sure if you tracked them against full game total for the season. (the RHE games you played). Keep it going.
    Hey ebe long time and good to see you hope all is well with everyone at home. I've been asked this question many times and I was tracking it for a while and there is a correlation and it did show profit but not as much as you may think at least not as much when I tracked it. Granted it wasn't tracked for any length to get a decent sample size so honestly I couldn't tell if the profit would have held. I believe walks has most to do with that if that makes any sense. I know I'm not telling you anything you don't know that the pluses for playing FG total is higher limits, less likely to get cut and many more books that use a 20 cent line on total's and some that use reduced juice that you can't get betting on a prop. 20 cent lines are rare on this prop

    Also todays game for example the first four runs score on three hits. So the game was almost halfway to the total and just seven towards the 28. Also another factor is I would say 90% of the RHE's are under's and with an under for the most part you need two pitchers pretty much on their game and hopefully the bullpen doesn't come in and blow up. I guess the same can be said for the RHE's because it can blow up in 9th inning also. In this case today and believe me we got lucky Bundy pitched a 2 hitter and K'd 14 helping it stay under the 28.

    Wish I did track it last year. I was 203-152 and if you count pushes 10 If you used an average 30 cent line say an average of -115 you made a little over 28 units just on that bet.
    I still have the work from last year but I really don't have time to back track it. Good talking to you. I'd be long gone if I max bet them with a couple of my places just trying to move money around laying the extra 5 cents here and there. Picking up low 4 figure checks for as long as I can. What's the saying Pigs get fat Hogs get slaughtered.

  11. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,509
    Thanks
    349
    Thanked 1,527 Times in 916 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Old-Timer View Post
    Hey ebe long time and good to see you hope all is well with everyone at home. I've been asked this question many times and I was tracking it for a while and there is a correlation and it did show profit but not as much as you may think at least not as much when I tracked it. Granted it wasn't tracked for any length to get a decent sample size so honestly I couldn't tell if the profit would have held. I believe walks has most to do with that if that makes any sense. I know I'm not telling you anything you don't know that the pluses for playing FG total is higher limits, less likely to get cut and many more books that use a 20 cent line on total's and some that use reduced juice that you can't get betting on a prop. 20 cent lines are rare on this prop

    Also todays game for example the first four runs score on three hits. So the game was almost halfway to the total and just seven towards the 28. Also another factor is I would say 90% of the RHE's are under's and with an under for the most part you need two pitchers pretty much on their game and hopefully the bullpen doesn't come in and blow up. I guess the same can be said for the RHE's because it can blow up in 9th inning also. In this case today and believe me we got lucky Bundy pitched a 2 hitter and K'd 14 helping it stay under the 28.

    Wish I did track it last year. I was 203-152 and if you count pushes 10 If you used an average 30 cent line say an average of -115 you made a little over 28 units just on that bet.
    I still have the work from last year but I really don't have time to back track it. Good talking to you. I'd be long gone if I max bet them with a couple of my places just trying to move money around laying the extra 5 cents here and there. Picking up low 4 figure checks for as long as I can. What's the saying Pigs get fat Hogs get slaughtered.
    Thanks. Normally I wouldn't bother you with something like, I'd see if I could dig it up myself, was just busy & curious. All is well, hope the same for you. Nice work.

  12. #38
    Senior Member Old-Timer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    9,356
    Thanks
    6,775
    Thanked 5,278 Times in 3,598 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ebemiss View Post
    Thanks. Normally I wouldn't bother you with something like, I'd see if I could dig it up myself, was just busy & curious. All is well, hope the same for you. Nice work.
    If you want the link to last year's results I'd be more than happy to send them to you. Don't know if you still have my email but if you don't and want them just email here and I will also and I'll send them to you. I wouldn't know where to begin with a computer but I know how good you are.
    You can never bother me ebe we go back to far and Tks.

  13. Thanks:

    The Following User Says Thank You to Old-Timer For This Useful Post:

    ebemiss (05-24-2018)  

  14. #39
    Senior Member Old-Timer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    9,356
    Thanks
    6,775
    Thanked 5,278 Times in 3,598 Posts

    Default

    Record
    5/18 4-0 +4.00
    5/19 0-1 <1.20>
    5/20 2-1 +1.05
    5/21 2-1 +0.80
    5/22 7-0 +7.00
    5/23 4-2 +1.70
    5/24 1-0 +1.00

    Total 20-5 +14.35

    Plays 5/24

    #908 Under 28-110 CWS/Balt Win +1.00

  15. Thanks:

    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Old-Timer For This Useful Post:

    bumpo (05-25-2018),  fishboom (05-24-2018)  

  16. #40
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    873
    Thanks
    1,204
    Thanked 310 Times in 244 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Old-Timer View Post
    If you want the link to last year's results I'd be more than happy to send them to you. Don't know if you still have my email but if you don't and want them just email here and I will also and I'll send them to you. I wouldn't know where to begin with a computer but I know how good you are.
    You can never bother me ebe we go back to far and Tks.
    I'd love to see that if you would be so kind, OT...kind of missed the boat on this thread but would like to play catch up if possible...

  17. #41
    Senior Member Old-Timer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    9,356
    Thanks
    6,775
    Thanked 5,278 Times in 3,598 Posts

    Default

    munson

    I don't understand what is it that you would like to catch up on. I wouldn't put the link here I would need your email address. In the post to ebe I said just email them here my meaning was to email admin@raspicks.com and ask for my email and I would do the same. After reading my post again I see it sounds like post your email here. I was offering the link for backtracking which would be quite the task but if you would like to take it on to see if the FG and RHE'S correlate and it's worth betting both then let me know and I'll send you the link with over 350 bets to backtrack.

  18. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    873
    Thanks
    1,204
    Thanked 310 Times in 244 Posts

    Default

    'catch up' meaning tailing the RHE plays going forward, and the email just to be in touch occasionally...sorry the message was pretty vague I admit...

  19. #43
    Senior Member Old-Timer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    9,356
    Thanks
    6,775
    Thanked 5,278 Times in 3,598 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by munson15 View Post
    'catch up' meaning tailing the RHE plays going forward, and the email just to be in touch occasionally...sorry the message was pretty vague I admit...
    Sure email admin@raspicks.com and I'll do the same this afternoon. Would love to stay in touch. On my way to see the doc. so they'll hear from me later. GL today

  20. #44
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    873
    Thanks
    1,204
    Thanked 310 Times in 244 Posts

    Default

    hope it's good news, OT! thanks

  21. #45
    Senior Member Old-Timer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    9,356
    Thanks
    6,775
    Thanked 5,278 Times in 3,598 Posts

    Default

    Record
    5/18-5/24 20-5 +14.35

    Friday 5/25

    -#964 Under 27.5 -115 Yanks/LAA
    #966 Under 28 -110 Det/CWS
    #976 Under 28.5 -115 Philly/Toronto (There's 28 -105 around is good nothing less)
    #978 Under 30.5 -115 Boston/Atlanta (BM)

    There's two I passed on Under 30.5 Cubs/SF I don't know what number to put on the wind. I usually pass the cub games when there total O/U is 9.5 or more.
    Also just making it is Under 31.5 Colorado/Cinn a big number and stats show that Cinn not hitting well on the road and Colo not really tearing it up at home but it's Colo. I've bet under with games at Colo before and have done ok but with this game both pitchers have been terrible and it's funny both bullpens have been decent but how much damage before they get there. It's a pass for me. Not looking to confuse anyone just trying to give a little info.

    Most times I'll play the numbers blind but there are times you need to look. The Boston game with Atlanta killing lefties and at Fenway I still like the under. Lets see if we can get away with betting the Under on the Yankees again. I usually don't do any write ups but I thought something needed to be said today. It your call guys the best of luck always.

    PS: How's the eyes Jake

  22. Thanks:

    The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Old-Timer For This Useful Post:

    bluejake (05-25-2018),  h82lose (05-25-2018),  hornsfan (05-25-2018),  munson15 (05-25-2018),  turksure (05-26-2018)  

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast