Betting Talk

RAS Survey

eug44eug44 Senior Member
edited August 2014 in Sports Betting
I really commend you guys for running your service like a really business and reaching out for client feedback! Wonder if RJ Bell sends his subscribers service survey's? :) if i may ask, are you really looking to change business direction with what you do with the service? you asked a number of questions regarding clients obtaining your #, is there some sort of a plan to prevent lines from moving, head fakes? or just helping clients get a better #?
«1

Comments

  • golfer1000golfer1000 Senior Member
    edited July 2014
    I thought it was interesting as well, and agree first class service. Always enjoy reading RAS posts and or emails.
  • jmjm Senior Member
    edited July 2014
    Would decreasing nbr of paid subscribers really help? You'll still have people with automated APIs banging the pinny line before I can get my manual action in.
  • eug44eug44 Senior Member
    edited July 2014
    jm wrote: »
    Would decreasing nbr of paid subscribers really help? You'll still have people with automated APIs banging the pinny line before I can get my manual action in.

    people? two years ago I was able to probably get their number 75% of the time, this year maybe 2 games numbers kept moving away from me to make the matter worse and I am not disciplined enough to pay for a service and not bet the games. my understanding with all the big shops and those that mirror them is once someone hits a number it moves automatically even with an api (I might be wrong about this).
  • jmjm Senior Member
    edited July 2014
    i'm saying more sophisticated people are using APIs to get the bet in rapidly at pinny, thus moving the lines almost immediately throughout the offshore world. I'm not sure decreasing the enrollment would help unless it was such a few amount of people (and they'd probably be paying tens of thousands of dollars for the service).
  • RightAngleRightAngle Admin
    edited July 2014
    I appreciate those who took the time to participate in the survey. We are encouraged by the reported customer satisfaction rates but are still brainstorming to come up with ways we can improve the product while still making it accessible to loyal followers that have given their support for years. We'll be announcing plans soon. In the meantime we continue to welcome any feedback or suggestions.
  • procapprocap Senior Member
    edited July 2014
    I know you've posted your records against the closing lines before and they were still quite impressive. Given your reputation and the quickness of line movements, have you ever considered displaying your results against your release line and results against the closing line on your website? I think you do an excellent job of warning/informing people how quick lines move and you've always been willing to refund money to people if they can't get down. In my opinion, it could certainly be beneficial to both parties, you and the client, if you displayed the results against the closing lines. You're results vs closers are still much, much better than 99% of paid services.
  • jmjm Senior Member
    edited July 2014
    procap wrote: »
    I know you've posted your records against the closing lines before and they were still quite impressive. Given your reputation and the quickness of line movements, have you ever considered displaying your results against your release line and results against the closing line on your website? I think you do an excellent job of warning/informing people how quick lines move and you've always been willing to refund money to people if they can't get down. In my opinion, it could certainly be beneficial to both parties, you and the client, if you displayed the results against the closing lines. You're results vs closers are still much, much better than 99% of paid services.

    I did quick back of the envelope counting a year ago based on SIDES and came up with this:

    2011-2012 Sides: Against Closing Line +4.5 units

    2012-2013 Sides: Against Closing Line -3.5 units

    2013-2014 Sides: Against Closing Line -0.5 units

    3 years total with closing lines: +0.5 units
  • RightAngleRightAngle Admin
    edited July 2014

    <tbody>
    Year
    Record
    Record vs Close
    Record vs 0.5
    Record vs 1.0
    Record vs 1.5
    Record vs 2.0


    2013
    44-35-0 (6.5)
    42-37-0 (2.3)
    44-35-0 (6.5)
    44-35-0 (6.5)
    44-35-0 (6.5)
    42-35-2 (4.5)


    2012
    32-25-0 (3.95)
    30-26-1 (0.85)
    32-25-0 (3.95)
    32-25-0 (3.95)
    31-25-1 (2.95)
    31-26-0 (1.85)


    2011
    38-23-1 (13.7)
    37-24-1 (11.6)
    37-23-2 (12.7)
    37-24-1 (11.6)
    36-24-2 (10.6)
    36-25-1 (9.5)


    2010
    31-24-1 (6.05)
    29-27-0 (-1.35)
    30-25-1 (2.95)
    30-26-0 (0.7)
    29-26-1 (-0.3)
    29-27-0 (-1.35)


    2009
    40-19-0 (22.1)
    37-21-1 (14.8)
    38-19-2 (19.1)
    38-21-0 (15.8)
    37-21-1 (14.8)
    37-22-0 (13.7)


    Total
    185-126-2 (52.3)
    175-135-3 (28.2)
    181-127-5 (45.2)
    181-131-1 (38.6)
    177-131-5 (34.6)
    175-135-3 (28.2)



    59.48%
    56.45%
    58.76%
    58.01%
    57.46%
    56.45%

    </tbody>

    Those are last five years of RAS CFB vs release line, 0.5 worse, 1.0 worse, 1.5 worse, 2.0 worse, and closing line. Plays involving FCS teams not included. Units in parenthesis. Not all 1/2 points are of equal value in football, especially with sides and totals being lumped together, but it is important to look at results other than just vs the close as in most cases more favorable numbers than the closing line are attainable between release and start of game, especially for subscribers. 2011 and 2009 were outstanding years that will be hard to duplicate in today's market. 2013 season is likely the most relevant predictive indicator going forward.
  • golfer1000golfer1000 Senior Member
    edited July 2014
    Any update on this years cfb or cbb service? Thanks
  • RightAngleRightAngle Admin
    edited July 2014
    golfer1000 wrote: »
    Any update on this years cfb or cbb service? Thanks

    Will have something up soon, likely early next week, just finalizing some details.
  • NBA GuruNBA Guru Senior Member
    edited July 2014
    RightAngle wrote: »

    <tbody>
    Year
    Record
    Record vs Close
    Record vs 0.5
    Record vs 1.0
    Record vs 1.5
    Record vs 2.0


    2013
    44-35-0 (6.5)
    42-37-0 (2.3)
    44-35-0 (6.5)
    44-35-0 (6.5)
    44-35-0 (6.5)
    42-35-2 (4.5)


    2012
    32-25-0 (3.95)
    30-26-1 (0.85)
    32-25-0 (3.95)
    32-25-0 (3.95)
    31-25-1 (2.95)
    31-26-0 (1.85)


    2011
    38-23-1 (13.7)
    37-24-1 (11.6)
    37-23-2 (12.7)
    37-24-1 (11.6)
    36-24-2 (10.6)
    36-25-1 (9.5)


    2010
    31-24-1 (6.05)
    29-27-0 (-1.35)
    30-25-1 (2.95)
    30-26-0 (0.7)
    29-26-1 (-0.3)
    29-27-0 (-1.35)


    2009
    40-19-0 (22.1)
    37-21-1 (14.8)
    38-19-2 (19.1)
    38-21-0 (15.8)
    37-21-1 (14.8)
    37-22-0 (13.7)


    Total
    185-126-2 (52.3)
    175-135-3 (28.2)
    181-127-5 (45.2)
    181-131-1 (38.6)
    177-131-5 (34.6)
    175-135-3 (28.2)



    59.48%
    56.45%
    58.76%
    58.01%
    57.46%
    56.45%

    </tbody>

    Those are last five years of RAS CFB vs release line, 0.5 worse, 1.0 worse, 1.5 worse, 2.0 worse, and closing line. Plays involving FCS teams not included. Units in parenthesis. Not all 1/2 points are of equal value in football, especially with sides and totals being lumped together, but it is important to look at results other than just vs the close as in most cases more favorable numbers than the closing line are attainable between release and start of game, especially for subscribers. 2011 and 2009 were outstanding years that will be hard to duplicate in today's market. 2013 season is likely the most relevant predictive indicator going forward.

    Ed, Do you have this same info for CBB?

    Thanks!
  • increasedoddincreasedodd Senior Member
    edited July 2014
    I still believe you should put the picks out individually at random times instead of every 3 minutes. It is almost always easy to get the first game and much harder to get the rest in my experience.
  • James702James702 Member
    edited July 2014
    Would be hard for those of use with full time jobs & family to get the pics in , if they are sent out at random times.
  • RightAngleRightAngle Admin
    edited July 2014
    NBA Guru wrote: »
    Ed, Do you have this same info for CBB?

    Thanks!

    Here are the last 3 years of CBB since going to sides and first 10 weeks only:


    <tbody>
    Year
    Record
    Record vs Close
    Record vs 0.5
    Record vs 1.0
    Record vs 1.5


    2013-14
    91-71-4 (13.15)
    85-79-2 (-2.2)
    89-75-2 (6.2)
    88-77-1 (3)
    86-78-2 (-0.1)


    2012-13
    90-52-4 (35.3)
    79-62-5 (11.2)
    83-56-7 (22.9)
    80-62-4 (12.2)
    78-65-3 (6.9)


    2011-12
    74-49-5 (23.45)
    68-58-2 (7.55)
    70-54-4 (13.95)
    68-58-2 (7.55)
    68-60-0 (5.35)


    3-year total
    255-172-13 (71.9) 59.71%
    232-199-9 (16.6) 53.82%
    242-185-13 (43) 56.67%
    236-197-7 (22.8) 54.50%
    232-203-5 (12.2)
    53.33%

    </tbody>


    As you can see, the results change pretty dramatically in basketball with every 1/2 point. The only good news here is it appears to be manageable for the majority of subscribers to get within 1 point or better of the release line on a consistent basis.
  • DavidPurdumDavidPurdum Junior Member
    edited July 2014
    This is really a fantastic post. Full disclosure: I do some work for Ed, but, from a reporter's standpoint, the charts showing how the picks have fared at the different lines and closing line is really interesting to me; as is the strategy behind trying to make sure customers have a chance to get the number. Good stuff and good luck to everyone this season.
  • procapprocap Senior Member
    edited July 2014
    This is really a fantastic post.

    I agree. It's an extremely classy move on Ed's part to be fully transparent in breaking down his results like that.
  • SquigglySquiggly Senior Member
    edited August 2014
    Does the study of the results taking worse lines include all plays, sides and totals?

    Is it possible to break it down further and show results for sides and results for totals in these categories?
  • golfer1000golfer1000 Senior Member
    edited August 2014
    I'm all for private service now. Don't care what it costs either
  • jmjm Senior Member
    edited August 2014
    golfer1000 wrote: »
    I'm all for private service now. Don't care what it costs either

    you not able ot get the released lines?
  • golfer1000golfer1000 Senior Member
    edited August 2014
    jm wrote: »
    you not able ot get the released lines?

    Having more trouble than ever before and still have all the same books. I have one book that's still good. Gonna have to fire there. I like having 2
  • golfer1000golfer1000 Senior Member
    edited August 2014
    One of my locals finally got smart. Haven't paid him once in 3-4 years and have absolutely crushed him. He moved sites, joined up with someone else and my password is being delayed at the very end. I have a huge max with him so it's my best out. May try first halfs but doubt it's any better
  • JafarJafar Banned
    edited August 2014
    golfer1000 wrote: »
    Haven't paid him once in 3-4 years and have absolutely crushed him.

    LOL. Not a fucking chance.
  • golfer1000golfer1000 Senior Member
    edited August 2014
    Wonder what the cost of private service for 1 year would be that includes football and basketball? What about 20k a person and get 50 people. That's 1 million for RAS. Sounds good to me:)
  • GoatsGoats Head Moderator
    edited August 2014
    Selling to 50 people doesn't seem very "private" to me.
  • golfer1000golfer1000 Senior Member
    edited August 2014
    Goats wrote: »
    Selling to 50 people doesn't seem very "private" to me.

    Maybe not, I really don't know. Guess it just depends on how much RAS wants to make and what people
    are willing to pay. From that, you can figure out what direction to go and how to go about doing it. But 1600 bucks isn't enough to weed many people out. Even 400$ a game would be a good investment in the long run for the cost of the service. There hasn't been much conversation on here about the idea and thought it would be interesting to talk about.

    On another note, I hope this talk of greatness doesn't jinx our season:)
  • duritodurito Senior Member
    edited August 2014
    golfer1000 wrote: »
    Wonder what the cost of private service for 1 year would be that includes football and basketball? What about 20k a person and get 50 people. That's 1 million for RAS. Sounds good to me:)

    What happens when your local cuts you off after week 1?

    I'd estimate RAS ev at maybe +20-25 units for basketball/football combined. I'd want a roll close to 7 figures and a ton of outs taking at least 5k-10k to justify that.
  • golfer1000golfer1000 Senior Member
    edited August 2014
    durito wrote: »
    What happens when your local cuts you off after week 1?

    I'd estimate RAS ev at maybe +20-25 units for basketball/football combined. I'd want a roll close to 7 figures and a ton of outs taking at least 5k-10k to justify that.
    .

    Your exactly right. That is the most concerning of all to me. Going to be hard for anyone to bet that much for an extended period of time
  • jakenhljakenhl Senior Member
    edited August 2014
    golfer1000 wrote: »
    .

    Your exactly right. That is the most concerning of all to me. Going to be hard for anyone to bet that much for an extended period of time

    That would be the only reason why it would be tough to do. Five years ago people were lining up to pay 10,000 for just college basketball. 20,000 for both football and basketball I wouldn't think they would have any trouble getting enough sign-ups far. The problem with 20 grand for the package Is anyone who pays 20 grand far the package is going to move lines. Hence the same problem.
  • RightAngleRightAngle Admin
    edited August 2014
    The question is could we get a certain number of private clients to work as a team and not pound CRIS/Pinn/BO, whatever in the first 15-60 seconds. That would make a huge difference and make the service a lot more valuable for those using it. It seems doable since only a small number are getting bets in on screen anyway. Might be something we try for 2015-16.
  • eug44eug44 Senior Member
    edited August 2014
    RightAngle wrote: »
    The question is could we get a certain number of private clients to work as a team and not pound CRIS/Pinn/BO, whatever in the first 15-60 seconds. That would make a huge difference and make the service a lot more valuable for those using it. It seems doable since only a small number are getting bets in on screen anyway. Might be something we try for 2015-16.

    Sign me up sir!!! I couldn't believe that 80% are able to get your #
Sign In or Register to comment.